Amd Fx 9590 Vs I5 4690k
AMD FX-9590 vs Intel Cadre i5-4690K
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD FX-9590 on 1 side and the Intel Core i5-4690K on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of v.0GHz. The 2d is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is ready to iii.9 GHz. The following table too compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache retentiveness, the maximum RAM retentivity chapters, the blazon of retentivity accustomed, the release appointment, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may exist earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when y'all click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertizement policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | AMD FX-9590 | Intel Core i5-4690K | ||||||
| Market (principal) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Piledriver | Haswell | ||||||
| Core name | Vishera | Devil's Canyon | ||||||
| Family unit | FX-9000 | Cadre i5-4000 | ||||||
| Part number(southward), S-Spec | FD9590FHW8KHK, FD9590FHHKWOF, FD9590FHHKWOX, FX-9590 Black Edition | BXC80646I54690, BX80646I54690, CM8064601560516, SR21A | ||||||
| Release date | Q2 2013 | Q2 2014 | ||||||
| Lithography | 32 nm SOI | 22 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | 1,200,000,000 | i,400,000,000 | ||||||
| Cores | eight | iv | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 4 | ||||||
| Base of operations frequency | 4.7 GHz | 3.5 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 5.0 GHz | iii.9 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 8 MB | 6 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | DDR3-1866 | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 | ||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | ii | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 29.ix GB/southward | 25.half-dozen GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 32 | sixteen | ||||||
| TDP | 220 W | 88 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 750W ATX Ability Supply  | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | None | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | - | xx | ||||||
| GPU shading units | - | 160 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | - | 350 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | - | 1200 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | - | 352 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | AM3+ | LGA1150 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket AM3+ Motherboard | Socket LGA 1150 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 57°C | 72.7°C | ||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 262 | 485 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | i,772 | 1,923 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 110 | 157 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 730 | 603 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 unmarried thread | 250 | 368 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 1,630 | 1,415 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 554 | 1,086 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 3,824 | 4,243 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 1,831 | 2,186 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | six,762 | 5,593 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core | 2,907 | 4,891 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench four multi-core | xi,922 | 14,236 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance | 91.52 GFLOPS | 268.ix GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Operation / watt ratio | 54 pts / Westward | 162 pts / Westward | ||||||
| Amazon |  | | ||||||
| eBay |  | |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links to a higher place.
Nosotros tin can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We presume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray bulldoze. Nosotros will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to accept several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to prove a price. Y'all should refer to the corresponding online stores for the latest price, equally well equally availability.
The processor AMD FX-9590 has more cores, the maximum frequency of AMD FX-9590 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core i5-4690K is less. The Intel Core i5-4690K was started more than recently.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench iv.
| CPU-Z - Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-4690K | 485 1,923 |
| AMD FX-9590 | 262 ane,772 |
In single cadre, the difference is 85%. In multi-cadre, the difference in terms of gap is nine%.
Annotation: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are just an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a organisation data software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the procedure. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. Information technology makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 - Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD FX-9590 | 110 730 |
| Intel Core i5-4690K | 157 603 |
In single core, the divergence is -30%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 21%.
Note: Commissions may exist earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you lot may become unlike results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the operation of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more than powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R20 - Multi-thread & unmarried thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD FX-9590 | 250 ane,630 |
| Intel Core i5-4690K | 368 1,415 |
In single core, the difference is -32%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 15%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
boilerplate of the performances got with these processors, yous may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such every bit a estimator, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into business relationship recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
| Cinebench R23 - Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-4690K | one,086 4,243 |
| AMD FX-9590 | 554 3,824 |
In unmarried core, the divergence is 96%. In multi-core, the departure in terms of gap is xi%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into business relationship recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark - CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| AMD FX-9590 | 1,831 6,762 |
| Intel Core i5-4690K | ii,186 5,593 |
In single core, the difference is -16%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 21%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are just an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get unlike results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several operation tests including prime numbers, integers, floating signal, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the college is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench four - Multi-core & single core score - Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-4690K | four,891 fourteen,236 |
| AMD FX-9590 | two,907 11,922 |
In unmarried core, the difference is 68%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 19%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-4690K | 5,030 13,222 |
| AMD FX-9590 | 2,863 10,935 |
In unmarried core, the difference is 76%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 21%.
On Mac Bone X 64-bit:
| Geekbench four - Multi-core & single core score - Mac Bone X 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-4690K | 4,642 13,652 |
| AMD FX-9590 | ii,866 12,820 |
In unmarried cadre, the difference is 62%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is vi%.
Annotation: Commissions may be earned from the links in a higher place. These scores are simply an
boilerplate of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete criterion platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows united states to meliorate visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, nosotros took an boilerplate of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
AMD FX-9590 Intel equivalentIntel Core i5-4690K AMD equivalent
Run across besides:
Intel Cadre i5-4690Intel Core i5-4690S
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a committee. Chapter programs and affiliations include, but are not express to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Acquaintance I earn from qualifying purchases.
This folio includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no actress cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #advertising.
Information:
Nosotros do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own take a chance. Some or all of this information may exist out of appointment or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date data regarding the specifics of these products.
Amd Fx 9590 Vs I5 4690k,
Source: https://gadgetversus.com/processor/amd-fx-9590-vs-intel-core-i5-4690k/
Posted by: wimmeryourte.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Amd Fx 9590 Vs I5 4690k"
Post a Comment